2. Strategic operational landmarks of the “NUCLEUS” device: An explanation of the necessary operational stages.

In principle, synthesizing what has been said so far, the NUCLEUS device works through several complementary but relatively distinct stages, carried out under the control of the physician-therapist. Essentially, these stages are as follows:

Stage 1. Patient calibration with the device involves entering into its memory/software some personal data of the patient, which allows the definition/recognition of the specific bio-psychological matrix of the patient, through:

• the age and sex of the patient, to inform the device about the patient’s specific morphological structure, depending on age, on one hand, and about the differentiated energy structure according to sex, on the other hand;
• bodily data, such as height and weight, which will allow the software to establish therapeutic solutions targeting body mass, the size of neurovascular circuits, etc.;
• various (major) ailments suffered by the patient throughout life – punctual or chronic – ultimately allow the completion of an up-to-date – ideal – picture of the patient, which the software will use as a comparison benchmark.

In line with the provided and recorded data, this initial calibration operation is essential for the objective recognition of the human subject, to whom – depending on the obtained data – the device can create an unmistakable bio-physiological personality profile. This picture is complemented by the (para)clinical one that the therapist can directly perform.

Stage 2. Collecting data for analyzing the patient’s health status (respectively evaluating the stresses initiated and monitored by the physician/therapist with the help of the device) is performed with the help of data-collecting sensors available to the device, which allow obtaining bioelectric data primarily based on the body’s electro-conductivity. These pieces of information – obtained through direct measurements, with the help of wired sensors – are more than sufficient to make a relatively accurate assessment of the (dys)functional/stressful situations faced by the human body (those targeting the implicit OME system).

Throughout the analysis, the NUCLEUS device is connected to the body through ultra-sensitive sensors placed on the patient’s head and limbs, in the five information-collecting zones defining the state of the entire organism. Through these sensors, the device resonates with the numerous tissues of the organs, with the nutrients or toxins present in the body, etc., recording their specific bioelectric values. These values are transferred through the device’s conductors to its “box” and then to the software it is equipped with. At this level, with the help of the acquired data, a specific unifying frequency is calculated: the trivector resonance, representing the mathematical calculation of the relationship between voltage, current, and resistance.

In this way, the device already has a comprehensive – but also unifying – initial image of the patient’s overall condition.

Stage 3. Comparing the acquired data with the device’s reference data. Once an initial “reading” of the bioelectrical measurements made by the device sensors is obtained, a comparison between these measurements and the existing “reference” data in the device software is to be conducted. The purpose of this comparison is to correct/optimize abnormal/pathological frequencies of the organism as much as possible through a strategy of “gradual accommodation.” Such accommodation is automatically achieved by the device software, which – noting a certain discrepancy between a pathological signal received from an organ (of the OME system, for example) and the reference value stored in the software – attempts to correct it by transmitting to the target organ an electric impulse considered to have an optimizing frequency, intensity, number of transmitted cycles, etc.

The response of the organ to this optimizing attempt is in turn analyzed by the computer, which then transmits another impulse, with increased efficiency, and so on, the process repeating several times.

This bio-feedback circuit type is automatically repeated by the device software during 5 corrective loops, within a few (milli)seconds. After this, it is considered that the device software has established the optimal possible level and that it has calculated the fastest and most stable biofeedback loop that the organism needs.

The truly astonishing performance – which only an ultra-advanced computer and software can achieve – is that the remedy for each organ involves a different analysis, meaning it requires different frequencies. This means that each algorithm used in the software – to calculate the fastest and most stable feedback loop – is unique.

Stage 4. Preparation/selection of the therapy’s optimizing sequence with the device. As mentioned, the device’s software has highlighted ideal frequencies (electrical parameters) through calibration, using three categories of information, namely:

a. Personal data of the patient, initially recorded in the software, which it implicitly exploits (as a determinant, corrector, correlator) whenever and wherever necessary;

b. Data of primary and direct evaluation, collected with the help of sensors and cables coupled to the patient’s body, at the ankles, wrists, and head, subjected to initial evaluations and comparative analyses;

c. Final data processed by the software, resulting from comparative analyses – through 5 cycles of mediation/standardization of real measurements – with the ideal values contained in the device’s software.

The synthesis of these data generated by the software will be used by the physician/therapist to decide the nature of the channel and the type of signals the device will send therapeutically or prophylactically – through biofeedback – back to the patient’s body. Thus, the therapist can decide to use a certain time and with a certain repeatability the optimizing solution – the therapeutic strategy – they have reached, using the device’s software knowingly.

Stage 5. The signal channels used by the device in the therapeutic or prophylactic process are controlled through the two structural-functional systems available to the NUCLEUS device, namely:

a. The technological components of the “black box,” comprising the energetic control circuits of the device;

b. The software with extremely complex programs (ranging from evaluating various states of organismal stress to highlighting possible optimization strategies, etc.).

Under this dual control, therapeutic signals are returned – through biofeedback – to the affected areas of the body, thus:

Through the physical channel of cables and sensors connected to the ankles and wrists, the following types of signals will be transmitted – commanded/adequately transformed in the “black box”:

• Electric signals/frequencies are directed towards the epithelial zones (such as acupuncture) and/or deeper areas of the body (in accordance with the Voll effect and the “embryogenetic resonance map” associated with it).
• Electromagnetic signals/frequencies, including “bio-laser” types generated by the device’s hardware-software complex.
• (Ultra)sonic signals/frequencies reaching deep into the body’s system (OME, for example), inducing various effects at that level.

In one way or another, NUCLEUS allows the generation of complex energetic-informational amplification effects in the body through the phenomenon of piezoelectricity.

Through the frontal sensors arranged on the surface of the skull, information of (bio)electrical nature will be transmitted, in accordance with the guidelines of the NUCLEUS software, directing therapeutic commands to the brain’s command centers responsible for the deeper organs of the body, as well as organs affected by parasites, etc. These commands are transmitted through the nervous system to the deep areas via transmembrane electrical signals, primarily through the sodium-potassium pumps associated with the nervous system.

It is worth mentioning that the surface and deep therapies facilitated by the NUCLEUS system are logically correlated by the device’s software to prevent situations of over-energization or “informational inflation,” etc. All commands generated by the device’s software are implicitly transmitted to the “black box” electrical circuits. Its processors perform a series of optimally established and directed energy transformations according to the organism’s needs, such as transforming electric energy into electromagnetic energy (luminous, laser-like, for example), into sound energy (ultra or infra-sounds), or vibrational-mechanical energy (diathermy), etc. Depending on the calculated needs of the device’s software, the stimuli transferred to the body via the two aforementioned channels will be allowed to “flow” – as necessary in terms of time, intensity, and towards the target, problematic organs, such as the dysfunctional ones of the OME system.

Through this mode of operation, NUCLEUS implicitly embodies the classic effects of electrotherapy, long known and valued, but now optimized through the novel functional aspects the device entails.

Stage 6. Procedural types of therapeutic (prophylactic) intervention. By integrating and synergistically capitalizing on all types of operations mentioned above, NUCLEUS can be used to generate two types of therapeutic effects, optimizing interventions on the human body’s health state, inducing:

• Stimulative energy signals – bioelectrical/bioelectromagnetic, of different frequencies – which interfere resonantly with the target system’s waves (of the OME system, for example), being “in phase” with the signals of biological systems that need regulation, optimization, healing, etc.; thus, an increase in the amplitude of these frequencies is achieved, and, implicitly, through such stimulation, a general and/or specific immune system parameter amplification can be achieved.
• Inhibitory energy signals, taken from pathological areas of the body, first, and then “reversed” or “negated,” afterward, to be sent back to the unhealthy target in the body that needs to be nullified; such “phase opposition” is achieved through classical electrostimulation and electro-acupuncture, targeting two major types of dysfunctions the body may face:

a) The presence of pain – of any nature – is always generated by the same “mechanical” cause, of a piezoelectric nature: the inflammation of cellular tissues subjected to any kind of aggression (injury, cut, infection, intoxication, etc.) determines a reciprocal pressure of the inflamed cells, which – pressing against each other – transmit a piezoelectric pain signal to the brain; in this circumstance, the device’s software can “automatically decide and order” the transmission of a “negated” electric contras-stimulus, with a dual therapeutic function:

• To contribute to tissue de-inflammation, and thus healing;
• To implicitly contribute to canceling the pain electric signal sent to the brain (and implicitly through the generation of pain inhibitors such as endorphins);

b) The presence of pathogens – such as viruses, bacteria, parasites, etc. – whose existence in the body is detected by the device and “nullified” / healed through “negated” frequencies sent by the device’s software, respectively by:

• Nullifying the vibration/vitality of the pathogenic factors through the inhibitory wave effect;
• “Breaking” the membrane of the pathogenic factor – as a result of the above effect – and thus physically destroying it.

Stage 7. The calibration with the human body of specific medicinal remedies (ointments, pills, homeopathic remedies, etc.) is done last – after administering the electric treatment – with the help of the test plate available to the apparatus, an ultra-sensitive plate attached to the “black box.” The remedies that are deemed necessary, measured, and calibrated – either at the doctor’s recommendation or at the suggestions of the NUCLEUS software – are placed on the testing plate, which scans and compares their curative biochemical properties in relation to the patient’s needs, and with the data already stored in the apparatus’s software.

Following this scanning and calibration (anti-inflammatory, analgesic, etc.), the doctor then decides which of these remedies is more suitable to be used by the patient for maintenance at home.

Summarizing, we can say that – in accordance with the functions defined above – there are two major processes, namely two types of optimizing actions of bioelectrical stimulation that the NUCLEUS apparatus allows. Thus, the apparatus’s software can accurately define – correlated with the nature of the dysfunction and its location in the human body – the type of reparative action and the respective transmission channel of the reparative signal, as follows:

(1) A first type of action – direct induction – stimulatory or inhibitory – of the currents established/calibrated by the apparatus, involves transmitting this type of electric current to the patient during the already established and controlled treatment session by the doctor/therapist. In this alternative, the electric current is transmitted – through cables and electrodes – to the connection areas of the human body, namely the ankles, and wrists. These areas are already known to be informationally correlated with a series of surface and deep OME organs.

Through this direct transmission of electrical signals to the painful areas of the body, the following are achieved:

• effects of muscle contraction, which result in improved blood flow, bringing beneficial substances and better oxygenation, ensuring faster repair of muscle fibers;
• pain blocking by inhibition, respectively by the “out-of-phase” action of the electric signal compared to the frequency of waves generated by painful tissues; this inhibition modifies the brain’s perception of pain, contributing to muscle relaxation and, implicitly, fulfilling the apparatus’s anti-stress

(2) A second type of action – the indirect one – is implicitly carried out by the electrical signals sent directly to the brain through electrodes placed in the head area, generating two types of effects:

• Bio-electric stimulation of endorphin production secreted by the hypothalamus and pituitary gland; in this way, through cerebral (biochemical) pain inhibition and the reduction of overall stress levels, contributes to the healing of the body (relaxation of painful tissues) and, implicitly, validates the apparatus’s function as an electro-antistress device;
• Electro-stimulation of specific nerve zones/pathways, areas of cerebral control and command, which transmit through biofeedback the command to reactivate an affected area (affected by muscle paralysis or certain dystonia, for example).

In summary, these are the GENERAL FUNCTIONAL STAGES that NUCLEUS generates and performs coherently when properly controlled, with the ultimate goal of assessing and optimizing the health status of the human biological system.

Two observations are necessary regarding the use of the NUCLEUS device:

• Based on the aforementioned therapeutic electrostimulation actions, the doctor can also decide on the appropriate strategy for complementary interventions – of a preventive nature that the patient can perform with the help of the apparatus.
• As a good usage attribute, it should be mentioned that all the optimizing programs and practices relied upon by the apparatus are non-invasive and free of harmful side effects.

This is because the device “mimics” analogically the operations that the human body “naturally” performs when – faced with a certain dysfunction – it seeks and finds appropriate solutions.

Regarding the specific therapeutic mode in which the apparatus operates in particular situations of a specific organic system – such as OME – the proper justificatory aspects will be presented in the context of subsequent clinical research.